The verification of concurrent programs remains an open challenge due to the non-determinism in inter-process communication. One recurring algorithmic problem in this challenge is the consistency verification of concurrent executions. In particular, consistency verification under a reads-from map allows to compute the \emph{reads-from (RF) equivalence} between concurrent traces, with direct applications to areas such as Stateless Model Checking (SMC). Importantly, the RF equivalence was recently shown to be coarser than the standard Mazurkiewicz equivalence, leading to impressive scalability improvements for SMC under SC (sequential consistency). However, for the \emph{relaxed memory} models of TSO and PSO (total/partial store order), the algorithmic problem of deciding the RF equivalence, as well as its impact on SMC, has been elusive.

In this work we solve the algorithmic problem of consistency verification for the TSO and PSO memory models given a reads-from map, denoted \operatorname{VTSO-rf} and \operatorname{VPSO-rf}, respectively. For an execution of $n$ events over $k$ threads and $d$ variables, we establish novel bounds that scale as $n^{k+1}$ for TSO and as $n^{k+1}\cdot \min(n^{k^2}, 2^{k\cdot d})$ for PSO. Moreover, based on our solution to these problems, we develop an SMC algorithm under TSO and PSO that uses the RF equivalence. The algorithm is \emph{exploration-optimal}, in the sense that it is guaranteed to explore each class of the RF partitioning exactly once, and spends polynomial time per class when $k$ is bounded. Finally, we implement all our algorithms in the SMC tool Nidhugg, and perform a large number of experiments over benchmarks from existing literature. Our experimental results show that our algorithms for \operatorname{VTSO-rf} and \operatorname{VPSO-rf} provide significant scalability improvements over standard alternatives. Moreover, when used for SMC, the RF partitioning is often much coarser than the standard Shasha-Snir partitioning for TSO/PSO, which yields a significant speedup in the model checking task.